SF Weekly is reporting that 66 year-old gay rights icon Larry Brinkin, who led the fight for same-sex-marriage was arrested for possession of child pornography last Friday night. According to the article:
SFPD acted after receiving a tip from the Los Angeles Police Department, which obtained from AOL an e-mail exchange between a Los Angeles user and firstname.lastname@example.org. Police say they linked the AOL address to Brinkin’s IP address; he is owner of the account and paid for AOL service with his credit card.
The warrant claims these e-mails contained images of children as young as perhaps a year old being sodomized by and performing oral sex on adult men. Zack3737@aol.com — whom the police allege is Brinkin — provided graphic commentary on the photos of interracial adult-child sex. Comments included “I loved especially the nigger 2 year old getting nailed. Hope you’ll continue so I can see what the little blond bitch is going to get. White Power! White Supremacy! White Dick Rules!“
Oh. My. God.
Of course, the liberal sickos in San Fransisco just can’t fathom their straight-laced white gay hero acting in such a horrific, predatory manner towards a black child (Justice for Trayvon!!), and are immediately circling the wagons:
We put in a call to Theresa Sparks, executive director of the Human Rights Commission, told us this allegation is “beyond hard to believe.”
“It’s almost incredulous, there’s no way I could believe such a thing,” Sparks told us. “He’s always been one of my heroes, and he’s the epitome of human rights activist — this is man who coined phrases we use in our daily language. I support Larry 100 percent, hopefully it will all come out in the investigation.”
Beyond the fact that poor Theresa’s vocabulary suggests educated illiteracy, a likely product of California’s public education system, she also whisks right past any victims and straight to support for her hero, interrupted, “I support Larry 100 percent.” Yea, there’s a shocker.
This is the part where prude “homophobic” heterosexuals like me point out that we are constantly berated for even circuitously suggesting that homosexuality is deviant. But here we are: A prominent and respected white homosexual engaging in child pornography and exchanging disturbing e-mails that expose him as deranged, a racist and potentially even a neo-Nazi. Exactly which part of the word “deviant” is so hard for us to agree on, again?
Exit question: Do you think the black “2 year old getting nailed” looks like one of Obama’s children?